TIL that 0 ..= 92 is valid pattern (playground) which means the same as 0 ... 92. Which syntax is the preferred one? Do we plan to deprecate the other?
0 ..= 92
0 ... 92
I also think that this wasn’t mentioned in release notes for 1.26, when this was stabilized?
Googling around more turns up this issue which suggests that ..= is the way to go and that ... is deprecated in the idioms lint group.
..=
...
It’s been mentioned in the release blog post as well as in the release notes.
That is for ranges (std::ops::RangeInclusive), not for patterns.
Oops, I see. Spoke too soon. Sorry for the noise.
This topic was automatically closed after 26 hours. New replies are no longer allowed.
