I already use Rust in production for some tasks and love it. I can’t build full server systems yet and the reason for me has nothing to do with the libraries. Coming from erlang I am use to not having nice libraries for things. If Rust is serious about servers and reliability I would like to see Joe Armstrong’s thesis and the mantra “let it fail” be taken seriously as a language concern. Before I will use rust deeper in my organisation I need to be able to sleep easy at night knowing that if some part of my application panics its ok because it was isolated behind simple_on_to_one supervisor or similar mechanism.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[Roadmap 2017] Productivity: learning curve and expressiveness
|
116 | 17115 | March 25, 2019 | |
| Rust Roadmap Tracker | 1 | 1046 | March 25, 2019 | |
| Call for participation: Async vision doc effort | 3 | 658 | June 16, 2021 | |
|
Rust 2018: the home stretch
|
11 | 11967 | March 25, 2019 | |
| Rust 2018: an early preview | 67 | 37602 | March 25, 2019 |