No sane way to generate [1., 1.5, 2., 2.5].iter().cloned()...?

Stumbled onto this old post.

Really? This works:

fn t() {
        (2..=5).map(|x| (x as f32) / 2.0).collect::<Vec<_>>(),
        [1., 1.5, 2., 2.5],

Maybe this is "insane"? Idk seems pretty standard to me.

TL;DR yes: iterate integers and then map to floating point, which avoids the pitfalls of accumulating floating point error.

(Generally points about using Rust rather than evolving Rust/std should go on the users forum)


The example given is probably deliberately simple; I know I would be much happier reviewing this code if the endpoints were made explicit. And I'd be significantly happier modifying the code.

I don't know if this functionality should be overly supported in the standard library, mostly because most of the time I expect people want some variant of linspace, or at least some extra control around what exactly the endpoints are and exactly how floating point is going to be treated.