Apologies, I was on vacation without much internet/laptop.
I believe so, yes. There was supposely a reply to someone else who email Graham, claiming that an update was indeed coming, but that was a while ago, and still no update. Still, I wouldn't propose forcibly changing the author whatsoever.
The author of
requests (with an "s") has emailed me that they'd be willing to let reqwest change to
requests, so that's a possibility. I also had registered the
agent crate name earlier, as another alternative.
Thanks for noticing! That's been fixed in 0.6.2.
I don't know if must block 1.0 or not. I would expect to add it soon, which would mean depending on unstable tokio and futures (besides of course the already unstable hyper). I'd also expect to provide both a synchronous and asynchronous
Client, naming TBD, and so the name
Client would probably need to be updated as well.
Actually, with regards to stabilizing without stabilizing hyper, I'm not certain how that will work. hyper cannot stabilize while Futures and Tokio still are unstable. Possibly reqwest could remove all publicly exported types that come from hyper, and thus exist one whatever version of hyper. This would mean making new types for
Method, and the whole