Ty in macro followed by >>

#1

RFC 550 (Macro future-proofing) allows ty followed by >, but do not allow >>. This causes Option<Box<$t:ty>> to err, for example.

This seems worth fixing. Do we want to also allow >= and >>=? I am not sure about them.

closed #2

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.