Regression report stable-2016-10-20 vs. beta-2016-10-20


#1

Regression report stable-2016-10-20 vs. beta-2016-10-20

  • From: stable-2016-10-20
  • To: beta-2016-10-20

Coverage

  • 5694 crates tested: 3545 working / 1502 broken / 23 regressed / 4 fixed / 620 unknown.

Regressions

  • There are 18 root regressions
  • There are 23 regressions

Root regressions, sorted by rank:

Full report

I haven’t looked through all, but the first few were because the drop_with_repr_extern lint was removed. Seems like it should not have been actually removed but made inert. Don’t we have some sort of lint for removed lints?


#2

Oh, the lint errors are because deny(warnings). There is actually a lint linting the removed lint.


#3

Apart from the drop_with_repr_extern there’s the following:

  • #[deny(transmute_from_fn_item_types)]: td_lua, hlua_master, zmq-rs
  • Unsized types in tuples: cfg-regex (transitive through outdated regex_dfa), lense, vectormath
  • #[derive(Eq)] with large arrays: pascal_string, assimp (transitive through outdated assimp-sys),
  • #[deny(deprecated)] + SipHasher: message_filter

#4

Thanks @TimNN!