Idea: Change type ascription syntax from `:` to `type` keyword

[burakumin]

I definitely concur with @kornel. The source of the problem is the struct syntax, not type ascription. Now I would like more details in the pre-rfc: is the struct field initialization (as I believe) the only possible ambiguity? Or are there other subtle cases?

[system]

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.