Await Syntax Discussion Summary

[newpavlov]

I've posted an idea which generalizes @await approach and one proposed by @repax earlier:

Idea: universal pipelining (a.k.a. making @await generic)

In “Await Syntax Discussion Summary” it was proposed to allow keywords to be used after ., for example: await future match foo { ... } // will be equivalent to future.await foo.match {...} Personally I am not fond of using . in such way, partially because it’s too similar to magic attributes and I think will be quite confusing for newcommers. But the idea on another hand is quite appealing. So how about introducing sigil for pipelining which (eventually) will work with keywords (accepting one …