A proposal to make the "task" argument explicit in futures


#1

This RFC has gotten surprisingly little attention from the community, but in the past many people have expressed a desire for this change.

If you have an opinion here, please jump onto the RFC thread!


#2

I really want to see this accepted.

While I don’t think it will help users of futures understand how to use futures better, I think it will help with making the implementation of futures more obvious. And well, compile time > run time.