So, every crate (dependency and the registry metadata) is tasgged with its registry of origin?
This is an important detail that you gave no indication of in the original post.
With all due respect, and apologies for drawing patterns where there may be none, this feels like a common problem with your proposals.
It doesn’t look good for you when your first appearance on the forum is basically “how do I fork Rust” and then further interaction boils down to an underspecified “I want this”. Paraphrasing you, your proposals benefit you, and any other effect is a side effect.
If you want to be taken seriously, I’d heavily suggest picking one of the dozen or so beginnings of ideas that you’ve shared on these forums, and creating a full, thought out RFC for it. This is a Request For Comment, and thus you should be open to discussion about the proposal, and ready to change your position if better arguments are provided. Most importantly, though: even though it isn’t an implementation plan, it needs to be specific about how it effects all surfaces it touches.
As is, your proposals read more like a wishlist than an actual actionable item that can be properly discussed. We don’t have your background knowledge. Convince us of what you think will be beneficial to the ecosystem as a whole.
