# Should the standard library have a basic Future runtime?

**URL:** <https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/should-the-standard-library-have-a-basic-future-runtime/10705>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [August 13, 2019, 11:10pm UTC](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/should-the-standard-library-have-a-basic-future-runtime/10705 "2019-08-13T23:10:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DoumanAsh](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/internals.rust-lang.org/doumanash/32/5790_2.png) [@DoumanAsh](https://internals.rust-lang.org/u/DoumanAsh)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2019, 8:44am UTC](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/should-the-standard-library-have-a-basic-future-runtime/10705/11 "2019-08-16T08:44:08Z")

</div>

That's not the same, so it doesn't.

Whether it is necessary is another question, but runtime != executor, runtime usually needs reactor also

---

_[View the full topic](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/should-the-standard-library-have-a-basic-future-runtime/10705)._