# Setting our vision for the 2017 cycle

**URL:** <https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/setting-our-vision-for-the-2017-cycle/3958>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [September 1, 2016, 6:03pm UTC](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/setting-our-vision-for-the-2017-cycle/3958 "2016-09-01T18:03:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 47

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aturon](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/internals.rust-lang.org/aturon/32/3272_2.png) [@aturon](https://internals.rust-lang.org/u/aturon)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2016, 10:58pm UTC](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/setting-our-vision-for-the-2017-cycle/3958/47 "2016-09-01T22:58:30Z")

</div>

> [@djc](#):
>
> If the current order of vision statement implies prioritization

I should've been explicit about this. The order does roughly reflect the sense one gets from the survey results, but it's rough at best. I'm not sure whether a ranking of the final vision statements is a good idea, vs trying to scope them so that it's feasible to get all of their goals done in a year.

---

_[View the full topic](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/setting-our-vision-for-the-2017-cycle/3958)._