# Regression report stable-2016-08-16 vs. beta-2016-08-26

**URL:** <https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/regression-report-stable-2016-08-16-vs-beta-2016-08-26/3930>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [August 27, 2016, 1:35am UTC](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/regression-report-stable-2016-08-16-vs-beta-2016-08-26/3930 "2016-08-27T01:35:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mitsuhiko](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/internals.rust-lang.org/mitsuhiko/32/379_2.png) [@mitsuhiko](https://internals.rust-lang.org/u/mitsuhiko)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 11:23pm UTC](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/regression-report-stable-2016-08-16-vs-beta-2016-08-26/3930/4 "2016-08-27T23:23:16Z")

</div>

> [@nikomatsakis](#):
>
> Hmm. That's pretty large. I have to say that I don't feel great about this. Particularly since that rule is hardly a popular one -- nor the most crucial.

It's already a pretty big warning anyways. I actually find it quite useful during development that it's just a warning and not an error. It tends to happen every once in a while and the fact that it does not immediately make the build fail I consider a nice feature.

---

_[View the full topic](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/regression-report-stable-2016-08-16-vs-beta-2016-08-26/3930)._