Me too. Specifically I do cryptography, where I often want different semantics (truncation/overflow/wrapping/checked) for different circumstances.
…so add an explicit type annotation if that makes you feel better?
…so use a type annotation instead of the turbofish?
As someone who cares deeply about language aesthetics, these seem like extremely minor syntactic nits which do not justify adding 310(!!!) new methods to the language which both duplicate and are incompatible with existing functionality, and invent a separate, parallel, bespoke language of method names instead of modeling the same concepts with types and traits.
Adding a small number of traits and/or trait impls which can interoperate with the existing types like Wrapping would make an awful lot more sense to me.