# Proposal: Cargo Lint configuration

**URL:** <https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/proposal-cargo-lint-configuration/9135>\
**Category:** cargo\
**Created:** [January 2, 2019, 7:57pm UTC](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/proposal-cargo-lint-configuration/9135 "2019-01-02T19:57:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nrc](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/internals.rust-lang.org/nrc/32/126_2.png) [@nrc](https://internals.rust-lang.org/u/nrc)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2019, 7:43pm UTC](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/proposal-cargo-lint-configuration/9135/8 "2019-03-21T19:43:44Z")

</div>

> [@JeanMertz](#):
>
> Just to clarify, you’re saying that the team is generally in favour of something _like this_ (pending an RFC to nail down the exact details), and would accept this as a change to Cargo by anyone who is willing to put in the work, even if it’s not part of the 2019 roadmap, and the Cargo team won’t pick this up themselves. Ccorrect?

Yep, exactly that. There is a bit of an issue that if the PR is large, then finding review bandwidth might be a problem, but I think it would probably be OK.

---

_[View the full topic](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/proposal-cargo-lint-configuration/9135)._