OK, yeah, I think I can agree with that. It just feels somehow wrong, but, I definitely see your point.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Pre-RFC] Warn about inaccessible types in public function signatures | 28 | 5289 | March 25, 2019 | |
| Accessing private struct members | 19 | 9393 | June 12, 2019 | |
|
Does "private in public" work with paths?
|
4 | 1167 | March 25, 2019 | |
| Pre-RFC: allow re-rexporting (pub use) to selectively export struct fields | 3 | 2650 | March 25, 2019 | |
|
Halfway-exported "pub" types in public interface
|
8 | 300 | September 20, 2024 |