New blog post about the lang team's initiative for this year

[leonardo]

Very nice article. Another way to improve the ergonomy of writing Rust code (that I think is not underlined enough in your article) regards the standard library. Some functionality is missing, or not the most intuitive to use or requires more code than your average Python programmer expects. In such cases you can usually improve the situation without changes in the Rust language itself.

I've listed few things here:

Some C# LINQ Samples to Rust

And here:

[Roadmap 2017] Productivity: learning curve and expressiveness

What follows is a list of problems that I see as a common source of confusion for new or intermediate users. I would love to hear other candidates that aren’t listed here. It’s a nice and bold list, I hope other people will add more items to it. See below for some suggestions from me. for which problems is it worth investing the effort to find and implement those solutions? Most of them, in few years of work. The fact that string literals have type &'static str which cannot be readily c…

I can probably list some more ones.