Moving `ArrayVec` has complexity O(capacity()) instead of O(len())

newpavlov February 13, 2018, 9:55am 3

I guess it’s an additional use-case for move constructors in one form or another. One of the previous discussions.

Topic		Replies	Views
The way to see how memcpy and alloca introduced by move is optimized compiler	4	1015	October 12, 2023
Add `push`, `push_back`, `pop` & `pop_back` methods to fixed-size arrays libs	40	2565	October 23, 2022
Idea: `shift_move` to efficiently move elements in a `Vec` libs	6	566	January 21, 2025
Vec! lack of optimization for "zeroed" types libs	12	1133	March 25, 2019
Defer memcpy when passing types that is !Copy until it is actually moved to another variable	5	1354	October 14, 2022